Writing ยท AI / Automation / Tech

2025-11-06
๐˜๐จ๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐ง'๐ญ ๐š๐œ๐œ๐ž๐ฉ๐ญ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐š๐ง๐š๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฌ๐ญ'๐ฌ ๐Ÿ๐ข๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ซ๐š๐Ÿ๐ญ. ๐–๐ก๐ฒ ๐š๐œ๐œ๐ž๐ฉ๐ญ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐€๐ˆ'๐ฌ? My analyst ran a prompt for neighborhood analysis. Crime stats, demographics, market comps. He got results. Then he saw mine. "How does yours look this different?" Same task. Similar prompts. Wildly different outputs. Many people treat AI like Google. Type question, get answer, move on. Wrong frame. AI is a junior analyst who needs coaching. It'll give you what you asked for. But the first response is shallow. It's showing it understood the assignment, not that it did the work well. Here's what changes output quality: Context beats cleverness. Frameworks like COSTAR (Context, Objective, Style, Tone, Audience, Response format) exist because AI needs the same things your analyst needs. What are you actually trying to solve? Who's this for? What does good look like? Feed it context before asking for output. Auto-prompt first. Don't write the prompt yourself. Ask AI to build it. "I need a prompt to evaluate submarkets. Act as an expert prompt engineer and a real estate analyst. Ask me questions to make this prompt better." It'll surface gaps you didn't see. Then answer its questions and let it build the real prompt. The level-up method. When AI gives you an answer, don't stop. "That was a level 1 response. Go deeper. Give me level 2. Don't repeat anything from level 1." Then do it again. Level 3, level 4. Each iteration digs past the obvious stuff. The AI stops summarizing and starts analyzing. Make it show its work. "Cite your sources. If you're drawing conclusions, show me where that conclusion comes from." This matters when you're working outside your domain. You need to trace the logic, not just trust the output. The gap between amateur and expert prompting isn't complexity. It's iteration. Don't accept the first answer. The best outputs come from treating AI like an analyst you're managing: push back, ask for depth, make it cite sources. Your next prompt shouldn't be a question. It should be a coaching session. What's one place you're accepting level 1 answers when you should be asking for level 3?
AI / Automation / TechHiring / People / LeadershipReal Estate (general)

View original on LinkedIn

โ† Back to writing